Hi everyone

Just accidentally sent out a "test" message. Yahoo Groups is being stubborn today, not sending out my last newsletter, so I thought I would write a test post to see what's going on, but wasn't meant to send it to everyone!

Sorry for the inconvenience.

--
DVDGuy

• New Members 7

Test

• New Members 7

*****************************************************************

DIGITAL DIGEST  | LiveUpdate Newsletter - Issue 208

25 July, 2010

******************************************************************

INDEX:

1. Introduction

2. Weekly News Roundup

3. Weekly Software Roundup

******************************************************************

1. Introduction

No mid week blog or guide as I've been busy moving mid-week, to my new place. Hardly anything is where it's supposed to be, as half of my stuff is still at the old place, and the stuff at the new place is everywhere except where they should be. But at least I managed to get my computer connected to the new Samsung 3D TV, and get Blu-ray 3D going, if only for a little while as I had to put my computer back where it belongs, in the home office.

******************************************************************

2. Weekly News Roundup

Hello. I've finally completed moving house, by completed, I of course mean that there's still tons of stuff that needs to be moved over. But this is the first WNR at the new place. But the roundup must go on, as they say, despite aching limbs and a sleep deprived brain. One good thing about the move was that I was finally able to test Blu-ray 3D playback via PowerDVD 10 Mark II to my Samsung 3D plasma. More on that later.

Let's start with copyright news. The US Copyright Group is in the news again this week as they step up their campaign targeting thousands of web users accused of downloading pirated movies.

The latest development sees the USCG hiring the services of smaller law firms signalling the next phase of their plans – going to court. It was always understood that firms like the USCG would avoid going to court whenever possible, since the costs are higher and so are the risk (of losing, and hence, setting a precedent that could hurt future business). But it appears the USCG is pressing ahead anyway, no doubt going after those that are easy to beat in court. It may also be their way of showing that they do intend to go to court, a criticism that critics have used in the past to attack similar actions, and if they can get a few easy victories under their belt, maybe a high profile one, then this can be used to scare more people  into paying up. And as for working with the EFF to draft a user friendlier notice to send to suspected pirates, it seems the two sides just can't get along and both may have to go and see the judge again to see how they can get things moving. This isn't the biggest surprise in the world, as one side wants to make the notices are serious as possible to get people to pay up, while the other want the notice to be informative enough to allow people to defend themselves – it was always difficult, if not impossible, to meet both objectives.

While the USCG aren't winning friends with web users, ISPs and rights groups, they are making friends in other media circles, and at least one law firm is now copying their strategy, except going after those who pirate newspaper articles, rather than movies. Suing hundreds of websites and blogs is Las Vegas based Righthaven, representing the owners of the Las Vegas Review-Journal. While most newspapers use DMCA takedown notices to get their full articles removed from forums and blogs, there is no money that can be made by taking this approach. But if the threat of a lawsuit, and the request for a pre-trial settlement works for the USCG on movie downloaders, then the thinking is that website owners will do the same as well, even when the offending content was posted by one of its users, not the website itself. The recent Viacom versus YouTube action showed that user generated websites do have protection from the safe harbor provisions under the DMCA, as long as they have a clear anti copyright infringement policy in place and enforces this policy consistently. So one might think this would apply to forums where users have posted full articles against forum rules, or blogs where users have made the same post in the comments. But the fear of an expensive lawsuit means that many will simply pay the settlement fee to avoid the trouble, although others are willing to challenge the claims in court. If this model works, expect all other newspaper owners to follow suit, as most of them are struggling to keep profits from dropping in what many calls a dying industry.

Moving to Europe now, it appears ISPs in many countries are not happy at their respective government's three-strikes policies, and are going to court to fight it. Three-Strikes, or similar laws, may appear to be aimed at users who download pirated content, but it is in fact aimed at ISPs, making them responsible for monitoring and "sentencing", for want of a better word, their own subscribers. The cost of the operation will have to be absorbed by the ISP, and mistaken identifies or other errors could even see the ISPs sued. The ISPs argue that since the music labels and movie studios are the one that will supposedly benefit from piracy being reduced, they're the ones that should play a more active role in enforcing three-strikes. The content owners, however, will argue that they're the victims in this and that ISPs should just pass on the cost to subscribers. The big question is if this wasn't about the Internet, would government, who are normally clueless about Cyberspace, be so willing to give in to the demands of copyright holders? If people were committing copyright infringement via the telelphone, let's say something silly like reading out loud books or newspaper articles to the person on the other end, should the telephone company then be tasked with spying on users' conversations so they can put a stop to this illegal practice? Should the government then help to make spying legal and part of the copyright laws? ISPs are nothing more than utility companies, like the gas, electricity or telephone companies, and making them responsible for what their subscribers do with the service just doesn't seem right. And if there are any technical advantage that make ISP level "spying" easier, then it would still be unfair to make ISPs bare the entire cost of the operation. It's forcing one industry, and tax payer money,  to protect another industry's revenue stream for no reason other than it's the easy thing to do.

The Swedish Pirate Party wants to do something about ISP snooping though, and they are planning to launch their "Pirate ISP", which will ensure no data about users if kept, so that their privacy is protected. The idea is nice, but I can already see the lawsuits and search, arrest warranty being typed up, probably before the ISP is even launched.

And when Hollywood is finished getting the government and ISPs to do their bidding, for free, they will turn their targets on those that try to innovate too much. Because innovation could eventually lead content being published without having to be controlled by publishers, and that spells bad news for revenue. Google TV is next in Hollywood's cross-hairs it seems, as the new proposed system which aims to present a common interface for viewing media, online and offline, on TVs may just be too innovative for Hollywood's liking. In their submission to the FTC, Hollywood studios claims that Google TV could potentially allow users to interact with both legal and illegal media, in the same interface, and that's will encourage users to all become pirates. Instead of seeing how such an innovation could revolutionize the way people buy content on the Internet, and instead of supporting Google, a company with a history of knowing how to get money out of the Internet and its users, they yet again focus on the piracy issue and the issue alone. Just like how music labels refused to work with digital music retailers and instead focused on more and more complicated layers of DRM, and then having the likes of Apple iTunes swallow up a huge chunk of Internet related profit that otherwise would have gone to the labels, Hollywood appears to be making the same mistake.

Instead, their solutions is, you guessed it, more DRM. Hollywood's new fairer DRM scheme, supported by pretty much all the studios expect Disney (who have their own proprietary system in the works), is now called UltraViolet. How is it friendlier? Well, it plans to make DRM protected files more portable, working in more players and systems, but it still has the stench of DRM all over it, and thus, all the same usual problems: lack of universal compatibility, the need for online authentication, and don't expect the files to work forever as there is no guarantee whatsoever that any DRM system will be kept supported and updated (at high cost by the DRM operators) forever. The IEEE is also working on their own "fairer" DRM, which will make digital files more like physical objects, in that ownership can be transferred, so sharing something with a friend could mean that you lose the ability to use the file forever if your friend do not return ownership back to you. The scheme, called P1817, could even work in conjunction with the monster that is UltraViolet, to make everything a bit fairer you see. The funny thing is that by acknowledging the need to make things fairer, content owners have just acknowledged that DRM, at least in past forms, have not been fair to users. I would go one step further and say that DRM is always unfair to users, so if you want them to accept it, make sure you give them back something in return. Whether's that lower prices, better services, or even just less hoops to jump through, it is needed. Content owners should not take users for granted, as they may just go elsewhere (and if there's no legal alternative, guess where they will be, and have been, heading to?)

In HD/3D news, as mentioned in the introduction, I managed to get PowerDVD 10 Ultra 3D with the Mark II patch to play a Blu-ray 3D movie and have it display as proper 3D on my new Samsung 3D plasma TV.

It took a bit of work trying to get it to work, but I've posted the instructions here for those that want to give it a go. The 3D effects are great, even if you're not getting full 1080p resolution, but that will only be possible when updated drivers are available for my ATI Radeon HD card. For now, it means I can play Blu-ray 3D movies in 3D without a standalone Blu-ray 3D player (although my free bonus one, part of a promotion Samsung were running here in Australia, should be on its way from Samsung, hopefully arriving before the PS3 gets its Blu-ray 3D update).

But while I wait for my Blu-ray 3D player to arrive, it may already be obsolete, thanks to the idea of "upgradeable hardware" introduced by the Blu-ray format. The idea says that, like software, there may be a new version out every year and you would need to pay to get the new version, if you want the latest features. We've already had Profile 1.0, 1.1 and 2.0 players, and I guess Blu-ray 3D counts as 2.5 or something. And when BDXL movie discs arrive (if they arrive), then we'll all need new players again (4.0, since 3.0 is already taken by the fairly unused Blu-ray audio format). It's nice having 128GB capacity, but not so nice when I have to yet again upgrade my Blu-ray player, despite how cheap players have become. Even the always versatile PS3 won't be able to support BDXL, since the only thing that the PS3 can't update through software, the Blu-ray drive itself, will need to be updated. And soon after Blu-ray 4.0, we'll have Super-Blu-ray 1.0, with Sony promising a 1TB disc using an even more powerful laser. Downloads, streaming, storage lockers … if only everyone had the bandwidth to make download a Blu-ray quality movie a matter of minutes, rather than hours (or weeks, in certain Internet backwaters,  like Australia), then we could get rid of the disc altogether, or burn our own discs by only replacing the optical drive in your computer, as opposed to an entire standalone player. It's bad for the environment, bad for our wallets, and it's just annoying.

But at least one thing to do with Blu-ray is going disc-less. Netflix streaming on the PS3 will finally work without a Blu-ray disc, and it only took a year after Netflix was first available on the PS3, and several after the Netflix was originally launched on the Xbox 360 (which had disc-less streaming from the get go). Better late than never, I suppose.

And finally in the ever rarer gaming section, Microsoft has finally revealed the official Kinect pricing. Which is exactly the same as the unofficial pricing all the retailers have been using for months.

The only surprise, and a good one, is that the $149.99 price includes a free game, Kinect Adventures. But it was Microsoft's other announcement which were a bit more interesting, like the new "Arcade", the Xbox 360 4GB, which is basically the same piece of hardware as the new "Slim" Xbox 360 250GB, except without the 250GB HDD of course. The price for this new console is $199, but if you buy it with Kinect in a bundle, it will be $299, so that's another $50 off Kinect's pricing if you buy it with the new console. Some will say that this attempt to compete with the Wii is doomed to failure, because the Wii will be much cheaper. But the Xbox 360 doesn't need to be the same price as the Wii, since it's a much better console (certainly plays more types of games than the Wii, in HD too). There's no Xbox 360 250GB Kinect bundle, which is a shame because that's the one I would like to buy. Kinect pre-orders on Amazon jumped back to the top 5 after the pricing announcement on Wednesday, but has since dropped down to 21. The Move bundle is at 49th.

And that's the news I have for this week. Sorry about the rushed nature of this WNR, what with all the mistakes and mindless rambling, moving house takes a lot out of a person. You didn't notice any differences? That's good then. What do you mean "it's same crap as usual"? Huh? Anyway, here's to a less crappy WNR next week.

******************************************************************

3. Weekly Software Roundup

July 25, 2010	Jaksta 4.0.0
July 25, 2010	BDtoAVCHD 1.1.2 Freeware
July 25, 2010	Ut Video Codec Suite 8.0.0 Freeware
July 25, 2010	TFM Audio Tool 1.2 beta Freeware
July 24, 2010	VDownloader 2.9.462
July 24, 2010	CamStudio 2.6 Beta Freeware
July 24, 2010	LoiLoScope 1.8.2
July 24, 2010	ProgDVB 6.45.3 Freeware
July 24, 2010	MediaPortal 1.1.0 Freeware
July 24, 2010	ReClock DirectShow Filter 1.8.7.1 beta Freeware
July 23, 2010	GOM Encoder 1.0.0.35
July 23, 2010	multiAVCHD 4.1 build 761 Freeware
July 23, 2010	x264 r1683 Freeware
July 23, 2010	BSplayer Pro 2.55
July 23, 2010	BSplayer 2.55 Freeware
July 22, 2010	Quick Media Converter 4.0.0.30 HD Beta
July 22, 2010	MediaCoder 0.7.5 Build 4703 Freeware
July 22, 2010	DVD Swarm 0.9.10.721 Beta Freeware
July 22, 2010	Free AVCHD Editor 0.2.1.258 Freeware
July 22, 2010	VideoLAN (VLC) 1.1.1 Freeware
July 21, 2010	WinFF 1.3.0 Freeware
July 21, 2010	DV Scheduler 5.55 Freeware
July 20, 2010	BluRip 0.5.0 Freeware
July 20, 2010	Replay Media Catcher 4.0.2.0
July 19, 2010	BD Rebuilder 0.34.05 Beta Freeware
July 19, 2010	DVDAuthorGUI 1.025c test Freeware
July 19, 2010	XMedia Recode 2.2.4.7 Freeware
July 18, 2010	TVersity Free Edition 1.9.1 Freeware
July 18, 2010	DVD slideshow GUI 0.9.3.7 Freeware

======END OF LIVEUPDATE NEWSLETTER======

• New Members 7

*****************************************************************

DIGITAL DIGEST  | LiveUpdate Newsletter - Issue 207

18 July, 2010

******************************************************************

INDEX:

1. Introduction

2. Weekly News Roundup

3. Weekly Software Roundup

******************************************************************

1. Introduction

• If I were to buy a new computer today (July 2010) 
• Game Consoles – June 2010 NPD Sales Figure Analysis 

It's like London buses, they say, you wait ages for one and then two comes along. That's what happened this week with mid-week blog posts – two of them in the same week! I finally updated a feature that I haven't touched in more than a year's time, with a new edition of the "If I were to buy a new computer today …" feature. This feature helps to satisfy (a small part) of my desire to buy new tech all the time, as I can live vicariously through my readers (the use of the plural version may be inaccurate) by researching and finding out what kind of system I would buy, if I were to buy one today. I think I enjoy the research more so than the actual new computer itself, for some odd reason. I posted a couple of specs for different systems, so while everyone will have their opinion on what's best, this may be a good start for those that don't like the research part.

The second blog post was the June NPD US video game sales analysis. It's come quite soon after the May analysis, but that's because the May figures were delayed by NPD. Some good news in there for Microsoft, as their Xbox 360 console beat pretty much everyone except the DS, thanks to the new Elite "slim" form factor. I'm definitely on the market for one of these new slims, but I'll wait until the holidays period to pick up a bargain (perhaps a bundle with Kinect, who knows).

Not a whole lot of "new" news this week, but some follow-ups of previous stories, and I am running a bit late today/tonight, so I'll get through things quickly (and if you want more stuff, you can read my *both* of my mid-week blog posts, of course).

Starting with copyright news, despite the legal authorities trying to clamp down on law firms getting into the anti-piracy-for-money business, the pre-trial settlement style letter campaigns, more law firms are getting into the lucrative business it seems.

The most recent is Gallant Macmillan, who represent the copyright holders of Ministry of Sound albums, amongst others, and they will be asking for £375 from those suspected of pirated a particular MOS compilation. But they claim they are doing things a bit differently, perhaps to avoid a public backlash, or to prevent authorities from finding fault with their actions. The funny part is that the £375 actually includes the cost of the compilation itself, which normally retails for £8.75, and so suspected pirates can actually keep turn their illegally downloaded songs into legal songs by paying the settlement fee. An expensive way to buy music, for sure. And instead of a situation where the copyright holders aren't dealing with the law firm directly, but through another party in between (possibly to avoid the bad publicity if it all turns sour), Gallant Macmillan will only directly represent the copyright owners who have intention to sue, and not just the the threat to sue with no real intention other than to get some money through settlement fees. The law firms will all say the high fees, compared to the actual cost to the copyright holders, is high due to investigative costs and other legal costs, but the real intention perhaps is to scare people into paying and maybe even scare them enough to stop them pirating in the future. Of course, for every person that is scared into submission, there are hundreds of thousands that will still go on downloading.

And if these "small time" lawsuits (or threats of one) can't scare people, then perhaps the government can do so through some kind of global treaty like the ACTA. And scary it is. Claims that hundreds of thousands of people in the UK alone could be jailed if the ACTA is adopted as law, by making copyright infringement a criminal matter, not a civil one, and even making "attempted piracy" a crime (so do a search on Google for "Toy Story 3 torrent" and you may be headed for jail). But most scary of all is that it's all very secretive, as if the government know that the people that they represent will not like what's in the ACTA and have done everything they can to avoid the public knowing about it – the US negotiators have been the key backers of keeping the negotiations secret. However, when the EU Pirate Party (remember that they now have a member in the EU parliament) invited themselves to a meeting to discuss the ACTA, and then were told that not only are they not allowed to discuss any aspect of the meeting of the ACTA with the public (which may very well be illegal under the EU parliament rules), that even notes weren't being taken for the meeting in case it gets leaked. And it is then that the Pirate Party walked out on the meeting in disgust. But the leaks do continue from people that find the secretive actions unacceptable, but the more we read about the ACTA, the more scary it becomes. But you can just imagine members of the RIAA and MPAA sitting in the shadows, smiling contently, watching as their wishes becomes reality. Sort of like Cancer Man in the X-Files (the first few seasons, anyway).

And you can see why the likes of the RIAA and MPAA want government to take over their job of preventing piracy. Because it's expensive, and relatively unproductive. The RIAA's latest accounts showed that in 2008, they spent $17.6 million in fighting online piracy, but only got $391,000 back in damages. Of course, they'll say that getting money back from past acts of piracy is not the main point, the main point is to stop future piracy. But I'll leave you to judge whether their efforts in 2008 have paid dividends or not in 2010, whether piracy is more or less common now. But not everyone in the music biz thinks the fighting piracy head on will result in anything. Peter Jenner, president of the International Music Managers Forum, a group that present feature artist music managers, says that the current thinking about copyright enforcement is no different to the 1930's thinking about alcohol enforcement, also known as prohibition. And both, he says, are laws that is "offensive" to the general public. Jenner proposes some kind of levy to help pay for content being shared online, much like how people in the UK pay their licensing fees for the BBC. I'm not sure I agree with a "piracy tax", since it's unfair on those that don't download pirated stuff on the Internet, however if there is a legal, publicly owned point of distribution, say a BBC for the Internet, and where a small costs are paid to access a good amount of content, then perhaps the solution has some merit. Much like how free to air TV exists, perhaps a free to download service, paid for by taxes and levies, might also exist to provide a good amount of digital entertainment to those that cannot afford to pay for premium content on a subscription based service, much like subscription TV. Using the same analogy,  there will always be people who will try and succeed at getting "illegal cable", but you can't prevent all piracy, that's just impossible.

And speaking of expensive lawsuits, Viacom's billion dollar lawsuit has cost Google $100 million to defend (successfully, for now), Google's CFO revealed. It's money well spent (and peanuts to a company like Google, to be honest), and it's an important victory for the Internet, not just Google. However, you can only imagine how much money was spent by Viacom, and you add both together, and apart from making a lot of lawyers happy, what else did it really achieve. Piracy is a cost to the economy, but sometimes anti-piracy is also a cost, and perhaps more costly if lawsuits had stopped websites like YouTube before it got off the ground.

On to HD/3D news. The news last week was that the PS3 will get the Blu-ray 3D firmware sometimes in September. It's good news for buyers of 3D TVs, and for 3D TVs in general, since it suddenly means there are millions of potential Blu-ray 3D capable players on the market all without people having to pay anything for it (other than the loss of the PS3's Other OS feature).

There's still some confusion about whether HDMI 1.4 will be needed, since the HDMI hardware on the older PS3 predates even HDMI 1.3. But Sony seems to think that this won't be a problem, and I guess you have to trust them on this, and they even went as far as saying "The [June] upgrade basically makes every PlayStation 3 HDMI 1.4 compatible". I don't remember anything about an update that made the PS3 HDMI 1.4 compatible, other than the "HDMI deep color" option added in 3.40. But as long as the HDMI hardware can handle high bandwidth transfers, then it should work perfectly with Blu-ray 3D, without having to limit the resolution for each eye to only 1080i or something. And as part of the announcement, 3D support for YouTube will be coming to the PS3 soon, which will be interesting. It's either going to be the same kind of 2D to 3D feature that exists on Samsung, Sony and a few other manufacturer's 3D TVs, or it will mean that YouTube will accept uploads of native 3D content in the future and display it as so. Interesting anyway.

Not much going on in gaming other than what I wrote for the NPD analysis.

And that's another WNR for another week. I hope you have a good week ahead and see in at the same place, same time next week for another edition of the WNR.

******************************************************************

3. Weekly Software Roundup

July 18, 2010	MeGUI 0.3.5.6 Freeware
July 18, 2010	ProgDVB 6.45.1 Freeware
July 17, 2010	multiAVCHD 4.1 build 759 Freeware
July 17, 2010	Replay Media Catcher 4.0.1.0
July 17, 2010	madVR 0.23 Freeware
July 17, 2010	Vista Codec Package 5.7.9 Freeware
July 17, 2010	DV Scheduler 5.54 Freeware
July 16, 2010	MediaCoder 0.7.5 Build 4702 Freeware
July 16, 2010	VSO PhotoDVD 4.0.0.33
July 16, 2010	DVDAuthorGUI 1.025b test Freeware
July 16, 2010	StaxRip 1.1.6.4 Beta Freeware
July 16, 2010	x264 r1677 Freeware
July 15, 2010	K-Lite Codec Pack 64-Bit 3.7.0 Freeware
July 15, 2010	K-Lite Mega Codec Pack 6.2.0 Freeware
July 15, 2010	K-Lite Codec Pack 6.2.0 Freeware
July 15, 2010	WebM 0.9.9.0 Freeware
July 15, 2010	Windows 7 Codecs 2.5.7 Freeware
July 15, 2010	Vista Codec x64 Components 2.6.1 Freeware
July 14, 2010	BluffTitler 8.0.8.4
July 14, 2010	MKVcleaver 0.5.0.0 Freeware
July 14, 2010	DVDRemaster Pro 6.3.3
July 14, 2010	DVDRemaster Standard 6.3.3
July 14, 2010	Moovida 2.0.0.15 Freeware
July 14, 2010	MKVtools 2.3.1 Freeware
July 13, 2010	Total Video Converter 3.7
July 13, 2010	TVersity Free Edition 1.9 Freeware
July 13, 2010	BurnAware Free Edition 3.0.1 Freeware
July 13, 2010	PopCorn MKV AudioConverter 1.82.4 Freeware
July 13, 2010	DVD2oneX 2.4.1
July 13, 2010	DVD2one 2.4.1
July 12, 2010	WinMPG Video Convert 9.1.5
July 11, 2010	CDBurnerXP 4.3.5.2256 Freeware
July 11, 2010	MediaInfo 0.7.34 Freeware

======END OF LIVEUPDATE NEWSLETTER======

• New Members 1